Rare Diseases Symptoms Automatic Extraction
Home
A random Abstract
Our Project
Our Team
Detection of MDM2/CDK4 Amplification in Lipomatous Soft Tissue Tumors From Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissue: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH).
[well-differentiated liposarcoma]
In
this
study
,
the
detection
of
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
amplification
was
evaluated
in
lipomatous
soft
tissue
tumors
using
multiplex
ligation-dependent
probe
amplification
(
MLPA
)
,
a
PCR-based
technique
,
in
comparison
with
fluorescence
in
situ
hybridization
(
FISH
)
.
These
2
techniques
were
evaluated
in
a
series
of
77
formalin-fixed
,
paraffin-embedded
lipomatous
tumors
(
27
benign
adipose
tumors
,
28
atypical
lipomatous
tumors
/
well-differentiated
liposarcomas
,
18
dedifferentiated
liposarcomas
,
and
4
pleomorphic
liposarcomas
)
.
Using
MLPA
,
with
a
cut-off
ratio
of
>
2
,
36
/
71
samples
(
22
atypical
lipomatous
tumors
/
well-differentiated
liposarcomas
,
and
14
dedifferentiated
liposarcomas
)
showed
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
amplification
.
Using
FISH
as
gold
standard
,
MLPA
showed
a
sensitivity
of
90
%
(
36
/
40
)
and
a
specificity
of
100
%
(
31
/
31
)
in
detecting
amplification
of
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
in
lipomatous
soft
tissue
tumors
.
In
case
of
high
-level
amplification
(
MDM
2
-
CDK
4
/
CEP
12
ratio
>
5
)
,
concordance
was
100
%
.
Four
cases
of
atypical
lipomatous
tumor
/
well-differentiated
liposarcoma
(
4
/
26
,
15
%
)
with
a
low
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
amplification
level
(
MDM
2
-
CDK
4
/
CEP
12
ratio
ranging
between
2
and
2
.
5
)
detected
by
FISH
showed
no
amplification
by
MLPA
,
although
gain
of
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
(
ratios
ranging
between
1
.
6
and
1
.
9
)
was
seen
with
MLPA
.
No
amplification
was
detected
in
benign
lipomatous
tumors
and
pleomorphic
liposarcomas
.
Furthermore
,
there
was
a
very
high
concordance
between
the
ratios
obtained
by
FISH
and
MLPA
.
In
conclusion
,
MLPA
proves
to
be
an
appropriate
and
straightforward
technique
for
screening
MDM
2
/
CDK
4
amplification
in
lipomatous
tumors
,
especially
when
a
correct
cut-off
value
and
reference
samples
are
chosen
,
and
could
be
considered
a
good
alternative
to
FISH
to
determine
MDM
2
and
CDK
4
amplification
in
liposarcomas
.
Moreover
,
because
MLPA
,
as
a
multiplex
technique
,
allows
simultaneous
detection
of
multiple
chromosomal
changes
of
interest
,
it
could
be
in
the
future
a
very
reliable
and
fast
molecular
analysis
on
paraffin-embedded
material
to
test
for
other
diagnostically
,
prognostically
,
or
therapeutically
relevant
genomic
mutations
in
lipomatous
tumors
.
Diseases
Validation
Diseases presenting
"atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated"
symptom
well-differentiated liposarcoma
You can validate or delete this automatically detected symptom
Validate the Symptom
Delete the Symptom