Rare Diseases Symptoms Automatic Extraction
Home
A random Abstract
Our Project
Our Team
Significance of unilateral enlarged vestibular aqueduct.
[pendred syndrome]
To
describe
the
clinical
phenotype
of
pediatric
patients
with
unilateral
enlarged
vestibular
aqueduct
(
EVA
)
and
then
to
compare
the
findings
to
two
clinically
related
phenotypes
:
bilateral
EVA
and
unilateral
hearing
loss
without
EVA
.
In
view
of
clinical
observations
and
previously
published
data
,
we
hypothesized
that
patients
with
unilateral
EVA
would
have
a
much
higher
rate
of
contralateral
hearing
loss
than
patients
with
unilateral
hearing
loss
without
EVA
.
Retrospective
cohort
study
.
Patients
with
unilateral
or
bilateral
EVA
were
identified
from
a
database
of
children
with
sensorineural
hearing
loss
who
were
seen
at
a
tertiary
care
institution
between
1998
and
2010
.
Those
with
imaging
findings
consistent
with
well-established
EVA
criteria
were
identified
.
A
comparative
group
of
patients
with
unilateral
hearing
loss
without
EVA
was
also
identified
.
The
following
specific
outcome
measurements
were
analyzed
:
1
)
hearing
loss
phenotype
,
2
)
laterality
of
EVA
and
hearing
loss
,
3
)
midpoint
and
operculum
vestibular
aqueduct
measurements
,
and
4
)
genetic
test
results
.
Of
the
144
patients
who
met
our
inclusion
criteria
,
74
(
51
.
4
%
)
had
unilateral
EVA
.
There
was
a
strong
correlation
between
the
presence
of
hearing
loss
and
ears
with
EVA
.
Fifty
-
five
percent
of
patients
with
unilateral
EVA
had
hearing
loss
in
the
contralateral
ear
;
in
most
of
these
patients
,
the
hearing
loss
was
bilateral
.
Contralateral
hearing
loss
occurred
in
only
6
%
of
patients
with
unilateral
hearing
loss
without
EVA
.
No
significant
differences
were
found
in
temporal
bone
measurements
between
the
ears
of
patients
with
unilateral
EVA
and
ipsilateral
hearing
loss
and
all
ears
with
EVA
and
normal
hearing
(
P
=
.
4
)
.
There
was
no
difference
in
the
rate
of
hearing
loss
progression
in
patients
with
unilateral
EVA
between
ears
with
or
without
EVA
(
16
of
48
[
33
.
3
%
]
vs
.
9
of
27
[
33
.
3
%
]
,
respectively
;
P
=
1
.
0
)
.
There
was
no
difference
in
the
rate
of
hearing
loss
progression
in
patients
with
bilateral
and
unilateral
EVA
(
41
of
89
ears
[
46
.
1
%
]
vs
.
25
of
75
ears
[
33
.
3
%
]
,
respectively
;
P
=
.
1
)
;
however
,
both
EVA
groups
had
higher
rates
of
progression
compared
to
patients
with
unilateral
hearing
loss
without
EVA
.
There
was
a
strong
correlation
between
the
presence
of
hearing
loss
at
250
Hz
and
the
risk
of
more
severe
hearing
loss
and
progressive
hearing
loss
.
Patients
with
bilateral
EVA
and
SLC
26
A
4
mutations
had
a
higher
rate
of
progression
than
patients
who
had
no
mutations
(
P
=
.
02
)
.
No
patients
with
unilateral
EVA
had
Pendred
syndrome
.
Children
with
unilateral
EVA
have
a
significant
risk
of
hearing
loss
progression
.
Hearing
loss
in
the
ear
contralateral
to
the
EVA
is
common
,
suggesting
that
unilateral
EVA
is
a
bilateral
process
despite
an
initial
unilateral
imaging
finding
.
In
contrast
to
bilateral
EVA
,
unilateral
EVA
is
not
associated
with
Pendred
syndrome
and
may
have
a
different
etiology
.
Temporal
bone
measurements
,
hearing
loss
severity
,
and
hearing
loss
at
250
Hz
were
all
correlated
with
the
risk
of
progressive
hearing
loss
.
Clinicians
should
become
knowledgeable
regarding
the
implications
of
this
disease
process
so
that
families
can
be
counseled
appropriately
.
Diseases
Validation
Diseases presenting
"unilateral hearing loss"
symptom
homocystinuria without methylmalonic aciduria
kallmann syndrome
pendred syndrome
You can validate or delete this automatically detected symptom
Validate the Symptom
Delete the Symptom