Rare Diseases Symptoms Automatic Extraction
Home
A random Abstract
Our Project
Our Team
Does Prior Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Alter Post-operative Outcome After Esophagectomy.
[esophageal carcinoma]
With
the
introduction
of
neoadjuvant
chemoradiotherapy
in
patients
with
esophageal
carcinoma
,
nutritional
access
has
become
essential
to
counter
deleterious
effects
of
dysphagia
.
Current
NCCN
guidelines
do
not
recommend
PEG
prior
to
esophagectomy
in
these
patients
,
but
there
is
little
evidence
for
this
recommendation
.
The
objective
of
this
study
was
to
compare
outcomes
in
patients
who
underwent
esophagectomy
with
or
without
prior
PEG
placement
.
We
retrospectively
reviewed
96
patients
who
underwent
esophagectomy
between
2005
and
2012
for
esophageal
carcinoma
.
Patients
were
divided
into
two
groups
;
Group
I
(
PEG
+
ve
)
and
Group
II
(
PEG
-
ve
)
.
Patient
characteristics
,
operative
variables
,
and
post-operative
complications
were
compared
.
χ
(
2
)
and
Fisher
's
test
were
used
for
categorical
,
while
t
test
was
used
for
interval
variables
.
Median
age
was
51
(
18
-
70
)
years
.
Lower
thoracic
tumors
were
more
common
in
Group
I
(
69
vs
.
63
Â
%
)
(
P
Â
=
Â
0
.
04
)
and
more
patients
underwent
minimally
invasive
surgery
in
this
group
(
50
vs
.
2
.
6
Â
%
)
(
P
Â
<
Â
0
.
0001
)
.
Mean
blood
loss
(
326
vs
.
465
Â
ml
)
(
P
Â
=
Â
0
.
02
)
and
ICU
stay
(
1
.
6
vs
.
4
.
3
Â
days
)
(
P
Â
=
Â
0
.
01
)
were
significantly
lower
in
Group
I
.
There
was
no
30
-
day
mortality
in
Group
I
versus
10
.
5
Â
%
in
Group
II
(
P
Â
=
Â
0
.
01
)
.
No
significant
difference
in
anastomotic
leak
and
stricture
rate
was
observed
.
Gastric
conduit
was
used
in
all
patients
for
reconstruction
.
One
patient
had
malignancy
in
PEG
site
biopsy
.
Percutaneous
endoscopic
gastrostomy
before
esophagectomy
is
safe
and
does
not
adversely
impact
post-operative
outcomes
.